Resume guides · 6 min read
Should You Include a Photo on Your Resume?
If you're applying in the US, UK, or Canada: no, don't include a photo on your resume. It adds bias risk, can get your resume rejected by ATS software, and wastes valuable space. But this is genuinely a regional question — in much of continental Europe, Asia, and Latin America, photos are still expected. Know the norm for where you're applying.
Why the US says no (and it's not just tradition)
The American norm against resume photos isn't about aesthetics — it's about liability. US employers are legally cautious about anything that reveals protected characteristics early in hiring: race, age, gender, and so on. A photo hands them that information before they've evaluated your qualifications, which makes their lawyers nervous.
Here's what actually happens in practice:
- Many large companies auto-reject. Some ATS configurations flag or strip images; a few employers discard photo resumes outright as policy, to keep the process defensible.
- Recruiters are trained to ignore it. The good ones will literally cover the photo with their thumb so it doesn't influence them. You've now wasted a quarter of your header on something they're actively not looking at.
- It signals unfamiliarity. In the US market, a photo reads as "doesn't know the conventions" — unfair, maybe, but it's a real first impression.
None of this is about whether photos *should* matter. It's about how the system actually works. Play the game as it is.
Where photos are still expected
This is where it gets interesting, because "global best practice" doesn't exist here. Country norms:
- Expected or common: Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, much of Latin America, China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, the Middle East. In Germany, the Bewerbungsfoto is a whole tradition — professional headshot, top-right corner.
- Mixed / declining: Australia, India, parts of Eastern Europe. Older convention said yes; younger companies increasingly say no.
- Firmly no: US, UK, Canada, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden. Anti-discrimination norms dominate.
If you're applying internationally, research the specific country — not just the region. "Europe" isn't one answer. And when a multinational's local office is hiring, follow the local office's norms, not headquarters'.
One more wrinkle: LinkedIn. Your LinkedIn profile should absolutely have a professional photo everywhere in the world — including the US. The no-photo rule is specifically about the resume document. Recruiters will look you up; give them a good photo to find.
The "but I look professional" argument
I hear this a lot: "I'm well-dressed in the photo, it shows I'm serious." I believe you. But consider what the photo is competing against. That space — roughly 2x2 inches in your header — could hold another bullet point with a quantified achievement. Which sells you better: your face, or "grew revenue 32% YoY"?
There's also an uncomfortable asymmetry. Studies have repeatedly shown that photos trigger snap judgments — about age, attractiveness, ethnicity, weight — that have zero correlation with job performance. You can't control the reader's biases, but you can decline to activate them. The resume is the one place in the process where you're judged (mostly) on words. Keep it that way.
The exception people always raise: acting, modeling, and some hospitality roles. Yes — if your appearance is literally part of the job requirements, include the photo. That's a tiny slice of the job market, and you know if you're in it.
What to do instead of a photo
If the urge comes from wanting to seem personable and real, there are better channels:
- LinkedIn photo. Professional headshot, plain background, genuine slight smile. This is where photos belong in the US/UK system.
- Portfolio or personal site. Link it in your header. Let your work create the impression, not your face.
- A strong summary. Two lines of "who I am and what I deliver" does more humanizing than any headshot. Personality comes through in writing.
- Video intro (if offered). Some modern application platforms let you record a short intro. That's the right venue for face-time — opt-in and structured.
If your country expects one: doing it right
Applying somewhere photos are the norm? Don't just slap on a cropped vacation picture. The standards are real:
- Professional headshot, shoulders up, plain or blurred background. Not a selfie, not a wedding photo, not you holding a fish.
- Recent — within the last 2–3 years. Looking 10 years younger in the photo than in the interview creates an odd first moment.
- Top-right corner is the standard placement in most photo-expecting markets. Keep it modest — around 3.5 x 4.5 cm.
- Dress for the role, one notch above the job's daily dress code. Suit for finance, smart casual for tech.
- Neutral expression with a slight smile. Not a grin, not a passport-photo stare.
Get it taken professionally if you can — in photo-expecting markets, a good Bewerbungsfoto costs €30–60 and it's worth it. This is one area where "good enough" phone selfies genuinely underperform.
The ATS problem, specifically
Worth emphasizing because it's mechanical, not cultural: many applicant tracking systems parse resumes by extracting text. Images — including your photo — can break parsing in older systems. Best case, the photo is ignored. Worst case, it corrupts the extraction of nearby text (like your name and contact info, which is usually adjacent to the photo).
Modern ATS handles images better, but "most employers have modern ATS" is not a bet I'd take with my job search. A text-only resume parses cleanly everywhere. That's a free reliability win.
Frequently asked questions
Will a photo help me stand out?
In the US/UK, it makes you stand out for the wrong reasons — as someone unfamiliar with hiring conventions. If you want to stand out, do it with a striking achievement in your first bullet. That's the kind of memorable that gets interviews.
What about a small photo in the corner — is that okay?
In photo-expecting countries, yes — that's the standard format. In the US/UK/Canada, no — even a small photo triggers the same bias and ATS concerns. Size doesn't fix the underlying issue; the norm is the norm.
Should I include a photo on my LinkedIn instead?
Yes, absolutely. LinkedIn is the designated place for your professional photo worldwide. Recruiters expect it there, and profiles with photos get significantly more views. Keep the resume photo-free and the LinkedIn photo polished.
I'm applying to a US company from abroad — photo or not?
No photo. Follow the norms of the market you're applying *to*, not the one you're applying *from*. A German-style resume with a photo sent to a Texas employer will look out of place, even if it's perfect for Munich.
Do recruiters really discard resumes with photos?
Most don't discard them manually — but some companies' ATS or HR policies do it automatically, and individual recruiters may (consciously or not) view it as a professionalism signal. Why risk it for zero upside? The expected value of a US resume photo is negative.
Related writing information
You can also use Open the Resume Builder and Read more helpful articles as part of your workflow.
Using a should you include photo on resume can make this task easier and more efficient when you need a simple online solution.
A should you include photo on resume is especially useful when you want a quick browser-based workflow.